Lim Chu Kang HDB resale prices
64 official resale records from 1990 to 1998. Use the sample size and price range alongside the median.
$61,750all-years median
$959median per m²
64transactions
Lim Chu Kang HDB resale history — median price
Source: Housing & Development Board resale-price collection · Source snapshot: 2026-09-03T14:49:20.091371+00:00.
Recorded sales by year
Source: Housing & Development Board resale-price collection · Source snapshot: 2026-09-03T14:49:20.091371+00:00.
Year by year
| Year | Median | Middle 50% | Records |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | $85,000 | $67,000–$88,000 | 11 |
| 1997 | $88,500 | $85,000–$91,000 | 8 |
| 1996 | $88,000 | $86,000–$110,000 | 7 |
| 1995 | $63,000 | $55,000–$95,000 | 6 |
| 1994 | $55,000 | $55,000–$58,000 | 8 |
| 1993 | $56,750 | $48,500–$65,000 | 2 |
| 1992 | $22,500 | $22,000–$31,900 | 6 |
| 1991 | $32,500 | $28,700–$37,000 | 13 |
| 1990 | $32,500 | $20,400–$45,700 | 3 |
By flat type
Each comparison uses the same all-years period for the town and national benchmark. Detailed pages are published only where at least 100 official resales support the result.
3 Room$64,25046 records · middle 50% $29,000–$85,000 · -64% versus national 3 Room median
4 Room$47,10018 records · middle 50% $37,000–$100,000 · -85% versus national 4 Room median
Compare Lim Chu Kang with every HDB town
Compare like with like
Use medians with their transaction counts and middle-50% ranges. Compare the same town, flat type and period before drawing a conclusion. A national figure is context, not a substitute for block, floor, lease, condition or transaction-date evidence. These aggregates describe registered resales and do not estimate today’s value.
Keep the town, flat type, period and sample size beside any figure you reuse. A difference between two medians may reflect the mix and timing of registered transactions, so open the town evidence and compare consistent periods before treating it as a market change.
Questions this page can answer
Data collected: . Data rechecked: .